Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Newsshooter

Rules & Guidelines

Recommended Posts

The Newsshooter forum is a place where industry professionals can connect and discuss topics related to our industry in a polite and respectful manner. This is not a place where we will tolerate bad language, threatening or disrespectful remarks, or any form of religious or sexually-orientated comments.

The administrators and moderators of Newsshooter have the final say in removing or censoring any posts or comments that they deem to have violated the forum rules and guidelines. All posted messages public and private express the views of the author (poster), and the owners of Newsshooter will not be held responsible for the content of any message. 

By agreeing to the forum rules and guidelines, you accept that you will not post any messages that are sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening to others, obscene, offensive, vulgar, or otherwise violative any laws. Newshooter has a ZERO TOLERANCE for anyone breaking these rules. Any user who is deemed to have broken any of these rules will have their account and their ability to post on the forum revoked immediately. 


Anyone posting on the forum is entirely responsible for all of the content that they post or make available through Newsshooter.com. By posting or uploading any content on Newsshooter you do so under the guise that you have have all necessary rights, including but not limited to copyrights, to the content you provide and the rights to use it. 

 

The owners of Newsshooter.com reserve the right to remove, edit, move or permanently delete any content item for any reason. Content which may violate any laws may be forwarded to the appropriate entity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Popular Topics

  • New Posts

    • It's a bit like the difference between say RGB and Adobe RGB (kind of) or JPG vs RAW, as there's more information available. It really depends on whether it's necessary for your work. My preference, whether it comes to video or photography, is to record at the highest possible/practical rates to allow for the best post-processing (you never really know when you're going to need it). It requires more storage space, but that to me is a worthwhile tradeoff. Once information is lost, you never get it back. A graphic example: https://i.rtings.com/images/chroma-subsampling/subsampling.png  
    • Thanks. That's very helpful because a C300 II and a 4:4:4-capable recorder is high on my list of candidates. 
    • Thanks so much and yeah will do, and I try to search first also. 😉
    • What are people's general views on gimbals? I have a love/hate relationship with gimbals (I own two relatively lightweight ones) and, in the few years that I've owned them, I simply cannot get to like them. I've tried a cheap Glidecam clone and just hated it, as balancing it was always like trying to get a drunken wife into a car (been there, done that). The gimbals work fine, but they simply can't hold my run & gun rig that weighs 4.3 kg. There are of course gimbals that can hold that weight and newer ones that can do that without having to break down the rig for full movement, but you then end up with a huge weight to carry around (and I'm able to carry some fairly hefty weight). For the sort of work that I was doing before COVID, I was using an Easyrig clone to support a very heavy rig, but I subsequently reduced the weight to a nice 4.3kg and did away with the support (wandering around some places looking like a Ghost Buster started to wear thin). But there are times when I want to move about with the rig and get reasonably stable footage, which kind of points to a gimbal of some sort. Recently I did some testing with a counterweight system, by attaching my monopod to my rig, with the monopod extending horizontally from the rear of the camera (aligned with the lens). The results from the monopod experiment were actually quite surprising, giving an almost gimbal like movement with a bit of stabiliser added in post. Noting that I can't Ninja walk (more like Bobba Fett sitting on my shoulders) the results looked little different to shots using another camera on one of the gimbals. This could be an option with some practice. Gimbals are all the rage at the moment, but are they really an ideal option for documentary style work, which is my main aim? Has anyone come up with a portable solution that doesn't involve a gimbal?  
    • Do check requirements of any festivals you plan to submit to, as well as DCP specs. Many may be fine with whatever format, but some may be fussy. You may find capturing in 16:9 (but framing for 2.35:1) and then editing for 2.35:1 a safer option, so, if necessary, you can re-edit for 16:9 later down the line if required (may involve re-doing some “pan and scan”, but with the vertical alignment). Unless of course you’re shooting anamorphic, then you can’t do this and will need to crop your master heavily to create a 16:9 version. Also consider that, if theatrical release is intended, it’s unlikely to be 16:9, but rather DCI 4K or DCI 2K (1.89). So, if you can shoot in one of those formats instead of UHD/HD, then do! The few pixels of extra width will help you anyway if you’re going for a wider look, and will mean slightly less cropping of the height is needed (you’ll need to work out the correct crop to cut a 2.35:1 portion out of 4096x2160 or 2048x1080). Agree that creative intent is a part of choosing what to do here.  
×
×
  • Create New...