Jump to content
Australian Image (Ray)

Filmic Pro Or Filmic Amateur?

Recommended Posts

Now I know that this may be a bit out of the square, but given that there is an increasing number of film makers using mobile phones to make films and whatever, I thought this would still be a subject that's on topic for this forum. Last week I got a new phone (Xiaomi  Redmi Note 9s), nothing special, but much better than my previous Nokia 5.1 as I'm not one to spend $1000+ on a mobile phone, so I always opt for something way less costly.

That said, this phone provides much better photo and video capabilities (amongst other things) than the Nokia (or any previous phone for that matter) and I wanted to exploit those capabilities as much as possible. To that end, after coming across numerous articles and YouTube video on Filmic Pro, I decided to get it (after running the test app to see if it would be fully compatible) so that I had better control of the phone's video recording capabilities.

Now after using Filmic Pro for a few days, I've discovered that Filmic Pro, which is touted as the definitive app for film makers, should be called Filmic Amateur. Why? Well because it's control features are aligned to DSLR/Mirrorless camera users and don't really offer the 'pro' capabilities that are so often implied by reviewers. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, you can't set it so that whatever frame rate you're using, the shutter angle is at 180 degrees by default. In fact there is no shutter angle control at all, just shutter speed.

What's worse is that shutter speed and ISO are pretty much tied in so that unless you change and lock the settings every time, you'll get less than desirable settings. Then when you exit the manual control screen, the exposure and focus is locked, which may not be what the scene requires. When you unlock the exposure and focus, the previous settings revert. What this means is you have to either be in fully manual or fully auto mode for everything. For example, you can't make use of auto focus and manual exposure. I've never come across any camera that functions in this way.

Other minor issues are the way the manual controls work and display. The sliding curved controls are not all that good, where linear control would have been much better, as then the screen isn't obscured when changing a setting. Also, the readout on the controls is very small and difficult to read unless you're pointing the camera at a dark scene. I haven't come across a single review that points out all these issues. All I've seen are extremely positive reviews that leave out what I consider to be some important deficiencies.

I'm still to determine whether the added functions (separate purchase), such as log, work as advertised, as we've been having some wet weather and haven't been able to really get out. I want to compare Filmic Pro to the built-in video app in the phone to see if there is a major difference in quality.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been in contact with Filmic Pro, after they contacted me regarding my concerns/complaints, and they have come back to me saying that they will look into the suggestions that I provided and try and implement what they can.

I've also been able to test the app in more detail and it really does provide much better results that I expected. With the Log v2 profile and editing in DaVinci Resolve, the results are quite unexpected, unexpected in a good way.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree. I’ve been asking for more cinema camera-like controls for years and just wrote them about this very thing - shutter angle. So fortuitous that you’ve just written this review as well. Maybe they’ll do it! The app sure does deliver the goods in the functionality area. Maybe a good ergonomics going-over will come next. I hope!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do hope that they take at least the shutter angle issue seriously, as that would solve possibly the biggest issue. That said, I'm very impressed by how much I can play with the files using Resolve and the results I can get, especially given that I have a fairly mediocre phone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Popular Topics

  • New Posts

    • Does the C70 have punch-in focus magnification during recording?
    • And just a comment on the ergonomics of the camera. It's incredibly chunky, so I wonder how comfortable it'll be to hold for any length of time, especially for those with small hands. More so if using the flip screen and trying to access the side buttons. One other thing is that some people will want a cage for this camera and with all the buttons, flip out screen, air intake etc, I think cage manufacturers are going to have an interesting time making a functional cage for this camera. Of note is that with just about every camera released so far, cage manufacturers have released a cage design just a few days after the camera has been formally released. I couldn't find anything for the C70.
    • I don't think you read what I wrote, so I'll try and make things a little clearer: - A single Canon LP-E6N (rated at 14Wh) gives me 52min recording time, so 3 x LP-E6N (42Wh) would give me 156min recording time. - One IDX NP-F970 (rated at 48Wh) gives me 188min recording time. - A single LP-E6N (in-camera) and one IDX NP-F (on-camera) gives me a total of four hours recording time (and it's hot swappable). - One BP-A30 (rated at 45Wh) gives the C70, as you say, 175min of recording time (and doesn't look hot swappable). As far as recording time goes and battery life, this is close enough to an apples with apples comparison. I have no idea what power draw difference there are when it comes to BRAW and whatever format the C70 is using for 4K, but someone might have an idea. I raised the issue because even now in one of the C70 YouTube reviews, the BMPCC4K is bagged for poor battery life while the C70 praised on its battery life. The BMPCC4K will ostensibly run for just as long as the C70 with the same capacity batteries. I should have added that you are looking at the batteries based on MAh, not Wh. The NP-F batteries are 7.2V while the BP-A batteries are 14.4V. You have to convert each battery to its Wh capacity. Why do you think all V-mount batteries are rated at Wh, not MAh?
    • I have looked at cloud based options myself too and have largely concluded it's still more cost effective to manage your own backups on local drives, and of course much easier should you need to access something from the archive. A friend of mine does use Dropbox with unlimited storage (costing around £450/year), though he initially had problems getting them to honour the 'unlimited' part. I looked into Google Drive before too, but I think even though they have unlimited storage with the 5 users I'm fairly sure they still charge you per GB/month don't they? Then Backblaze has the 30 day thing which is a bit of a pain. I'm considering getting a NAS that powers itself on and off daily for this purpose though, then even if I went away for a few months the backup should still be operational.
    • Does Canon C70 have an OLPF filter on it?
×
×
  • Create New...