Jump to content
Australian Image (Ray)

Anamorphic vs Spherical Lenses

Recommended Posts

This is just a navel gazing exercise where I've had this impression that anamorphic lenses are something special and desirable but, recently, had a metaphorical veil lifted. From many forums etc I've had this impression that anamorphic lenses are the de rigueur when it comes to film making, notably feature films; however, from watching this video from this incredibly informative chap, I now realise that there are major film makers who actually prefer spherical lenses for their work.

I understand how anamorphic and spherical lenses work, and that you can achieve a 'similar' wide screen look from both, but there are naturally some significant differences in the final results. To be honest, when I see some anamorphic lens use, such a JJ Abrams and his Star Trek stuff, I cringe because I really hate the constant lens flare (as well as his descent into darkness style). In fact, when I now watch any movie, this lens flare becomes almost a distraction, like some presenter with a twitch or affectation that takes your attention away from what they are saying.

So I just find it interesting that so many who don't make feature films own, or dream of owning and using, anamorphic lenses to make whatever it is that they make. What do others think, or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Popular Topics

  • New Posts

    • Does the C70 have punch-in focus magnification during recording?
    • And just a comment on the ergonomics of the camera. It's incredibly chunky, so I wonder how comfortable it'll be to hold for any length of time, especially for those with small hands. More so if using the flip screen and trying to access the side buttons. One other thing is that some people will want a cage for this camera and with all the buttons, flip out screen, air intake etc, I think cage manufacturers are going to have an interesting time making a functional cage for this camera. Of note is that with just about every camera released so far, cage manufacturers have released a cage design just a few days after the camera has been formally released. I couldn't find anything for the C70.
    • I don't think you read what I wrote, so I'll try and make things a little clearer: - A single Canon LP-E6N (rated at 14Wh) gives me 52min recording time, so 3 x LP-E6N (42Wh) would give me 156min recording time. - One IDX NP-F970 (rated at 48Wh) gives me 188min recording time. - A single LP-E6N (in-camera) and one IDX NP-F (on-camera) gives me a total of four hours recording time (and it's hot swappable). - One BP-A30 (rated at 45Wh) gives the C70, as you say, 175min of recording time (and doesn't look hot swappable). As far as recording time goes and battery life, this is close enough to an apples with apples comparison. I have no idea what power draw difference there are when it comes to BRAW and whatever format the C70 is using for 4K, but someone might have an idea. I raised the issue because even now in one of the C70 YouTube reviews, the BMPCC4K is bagged for poor battery life while the C70 praised on its battery life. The BMPCC4K will ostensibly run for just as long as the C70 with the same capacity batteries. I should have added that you are looking at the batteries based on MAh, not Wh. The NP-F batteries are 7.2V while the BP-A batteries are 14.4V. You have to convert each battery to its Wh capacity. Why do you think all V-mount batteries are rated at Wh, not MAh?
    • I have looked at cloud based options myself too and have largely concluded it's still more cost effective to manage your own backups on local drives, and of course much easier should you need to access something from the archive. A friend of mine does use Dropbox with unlimited storage (costing around £450/year), though he initially had problems getting them to honour the 'unlimited' part. I looked into Google Drive before too, but I think even though they have unlimited storage with the 5 users I'm fairly sure they still charge you per GB/month don't they? Then Backblaze has the 30 day thing which is a bit of a pain. I'm considering getting a NAS that powers itself on and off daily for this purpose though, then even if I went away for a few months the backup should still be operational.
    • Does Canon C70 have an OLPF filter on it?
×
×
  • Create New...