Jump to content
Martin

Which wireless video to get?

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am in the market for a new wireless video solution in the around 1500$ range for a 1:1 set. Needs to have SDI in and out on the transmitter, hdmi would be a "nice to have" as well. I have been looking at the Bolt 500 XT or LT, the Vaxis Storm 800, Hollyland Cosmo 600, maybe something from swit?  Who is using what and what is your experience, maybe someone even had the chance to compare some different systems?

Thanks!

martin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I often rent out some of my kit, and sometimes I rent additional kit for some of my bigger jobs. The Teradek 500 XT has become industry standard here in Norway. It's easy to get an additional receiver and the SmallHD monitors with Teradek built in works excellent with the 500 XT as well. I think it's the overall best solution.

The 500XT kit was on sale for 1499USD a while back, I bought it last year at that price too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Bolt 500 for a few years now.. I believe there is a newer version.. but as above Teradek is the standard .. all the rental companies have them because the they work and well built ..  simple and works .. you have to go a long way before it cuts out .. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, Teradek is more or less the standard, which means adding additional units or replacing one that may go down is pretty easy, as that’s what most rental houses will have, too.  And if renting your gear out, people tend to go with the well known standards, as well.  I have a 500XT set that I picked up at the end of ‘18.  Tx: SDI IN & OUT, HDMI IN; Rx: SDI OUT x2, HDMI OUT.  And I just added a smallHD Focus Bolt(5” monitor with built-in Bolt 500 Rx) like a month ago when B&H had them on-sale for half price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your thoughts guys. Guess I'll wait for the next fire sale from teradek...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of options out there! I think Vaxxis have a massive sale on at the moment, by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bolt 500 XT seems to be end of life, anybody heard anything of waht will replace it or did I just miss the announcement???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Martin said:

The Bolt 500 XT seems to be end of life, anybody heard anything of waht will replace it or did I just miss the announcement???

Interesting...  On their website, most of the 500 XT and 1000 XT Rx’s & Tx’s appear to all be ‘special order’, except for integrated smallHD monitors and the 3000 XT series.  One would think(hope) there is a replacement line coming, because I think it would be unwise to force all potential buyers to either(only) the very expensive 3000 XT series or the very expensive 4K series.  Yes, there is also the ACE series, but that is, in my opinion, sort of below entry level and very limiting, being HDMI only.

But then again, Teradek is considered the high-end and there are a lot of wireless video companies out there, so it’s conceivable that they decided to only go after the high-end(more lucrative) market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Run&Gun said:

so it’s conceivable that they decided to only go after the high-end(more lucrative) market.

I wonder whether that's a good strategy. When you consider that just about every product made (take cameras as an example), they all have their low cost options that initially attract buyers who can't afford the top tier stuff. But when they buyers can afford the top tier stuff, they stay with the the product because they have become accustomed to it and find it good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Popular Topics

  • New Posts

    • Actually, I need to make a correction regarding the battery capacity. The Canon LP-E6N has a 14Wh rating; whereas, the Canon BP-A30 battery has a 45Wh rating. That's 3.2x the BMPCC4K/6K battery capacity. My IDX NP-F970 equivalent batteries (at 48Wh) give me 188min of 4KDCI recording time (which I gather is far more battery intensive than what the C70 can record), so that's as good, if not better than what the C70 gets out of a BP-A30. The BP-A30 is also physically not much smaller than the NP-F970 battery. Just thought I'd add that info.
    • So Canon has introduced a camera that has a similar design to that of the BMPCC4K/6K, only bulkier. I'll be curious as to whether all the criticism levelled at the design of the latter will be levelled at the former. Perhaps Blackmagic's design wasn't all that bad after all. The C70 also seems to be a bit crippled in what formats are available, but then that's fairly typical with Canon. Edit I: I notice from the comments that there are still those who can't seem to live without a built-in EVF. Edit II: I also notice that there are still people about that complain about the lack of a 5" flip-out screen on the BMPCC4K/6K, the supposedly poor battery life, and now a lack of top handle. The so-called poor battery life of the BMPCC4K (especially) is a real bugbear to me when I hear it. The LP-E6N battery is only 1865MAh; whereas, the BP-A30 is 3200MAh, almost double the capacity of the BMPCC battery. With two LP-E6N batteries, I can get close to 150min of recording time, which is not too bad. With my current setup using an NP-F970 and LP-E6N, I can get four hours of 4KDCI recording. And those NP-F970 batteries (IDX) are far cheaper than the Canon BP-A batteries. Just thought I'd get that off my chest.  
    • @Günther Göberl. I'm not sure what it is, but anything especially to do with landscapes always appeals to me more when it's in a wide format. That project, for me, would not have had the same impact in say a 16:9 format, it would have had a made for TV impression. My view is do what you want, not what someone else dictates. And if some festival dictates a format that kills your creativity, and all that you're then doing is making a film to suit the festival, why even bother?
    • I also opted for 1:2.35 for this project  
    • If you need or reply on peaking alot ,I would recommend changing to "normal" ,set a level and leave it on all the time .. I used to use color (red) but was given the same advise and its really alot better .. 
×
×
  • Create New...