Jump to content
Julian Hatch

Cloud Storage (dropbox, backblaze, google drive)

Recommended Posts

Im currently considering replacing my 3rd copy of all of my files (approx 40TB and growing) with a cloud alternative..

So far im looking at backblaze, dropbox and google drive.. 

I have 100Mb/s connection at my office - however very local to me is hot desk location which has Gigabit connection (I believe its advertised as up to 10Gb/s)...

My plan is to hire a hot desk at this office precinct for a couple of weeks and look to upload all of my files and then just keep up with the rest from my own connection once the bulk is complete (probably average 100GB a week)

Does anyone have experience in doing this and or anything to look out for or any advice? 

Backblaze looks to be the cheapest but have heard you need to connect the drives every 30 days or else you lose the back up (this seems like a bad idea??)

Dropbox is the next cheapest and to be honest is the one im thinking looks the best and I already use dropbox currently on a small scale but am a little concerned on what sort of upload speed I can expect to get with their servers (cant find this advertised anywhere really...)

3rd option is google drive - you can qualify for an unlimited sized google drive if you are a g suite account with at least 5 users.. I already have an account with 4 users so would be adding a bit of extra money for this option but im going to guess their upload speeds are going to be the best? and possibly the data be the most secure there?)

Once again any advice much appreciated.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read over the last few years is that while you can upload large quantities of files to those cloud services and do so at high speed, if you need to download any files, it's a completely different story. It's not just a slow process, but also potentially an expensive one, as some charge significantly for downloads of what's been stored.

Check all the fine print very carefully before you venture into any agreement, as not doing so could become costly and very painful. That's why I still maintain that local storage is still potentially the most cost effective, efficient and safe means of storing data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Linus from LinusTechTips tried to back up his library to Google Drive. They throttle the upload speed after 1000GB or so, making it very slow to upload. The download speed is also not that good. 

I've used Jottacloud before (Norwegian service, where I live, don't know how international performance is) and they provided unlimited space. You do however need to have the drives connected and Jottacloud only makes backups of the specific drives. A little fiddly, but fine.

I've kinda given up on a cloud backup option as it's too expensive and too slow. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at cloud based options myself too and have largely concluded it's still more cost effective to manage your own backups on local drives, and of course much easier should you need to access something from the archive. A friend of mine does use Dropbox with unlimited storage (costing around £450/year), though he initially had problems getting them to honour the 'unlimited' part.

I looked into Google Drive before too, but I think even though they have unlimited storage with the 5 users I'm fairly sure they still charge you per GB/month don't they?

Then Backblaze has the 30 day thing which is a bit of a pain. I'm considering getting a NAS that powers itself on and off daily for this purpose though, then even if I went away for a few months the backup should still be operational.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went the Google Drive route and have over 110Tb uploaded so far. We have 7 drive users so we have unlimited space.  They don't seem to throttle you after 1000Gb from my experience, although they only allow a single user to upload 750Gb per day. So my work around is logging into multiple accounts on a single machine and just making sure to not upload more than 750Gb per day to each account. The whole cloud route is a bit tedious and slow, so its not our sole backup solution, we still have another physical backup but since were using G-suite regardless we mine as well utilize the free G drive space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • New Posts

    • According to Panasonic the most common problem is that the camera shuts down by itself. Has anyone had that problem?
    • On further reflection what I have in mind isn't going to work anyway over a long period of time without proper sync even an external recording from the Z6 is going to drift relative to a separate audio recording. As far as I can tell there's no way to deal with this without a camera with a genlock input. The Ninja-V with the AtomX sync can record timecode but doesn't retime the input and only uses the genlock also available via the sync accessory for playback. There also doesn't seem to easily be such a thing as a retiming HDMI to SDI converter with REF IN as far as I can find. The audio side of things is easier as even on a relative cheap device like a Sound Devices Mix Pre 10 II it's possible to send word clock in to the BNC input and timecode to the aux input from a device such as a Ultrasync One. I guess the problem is simply too niche as it only crops up in broadcast where everything is expensive or long recordings of things like concerts with separate audio.
    • It is a great camera. I actually bought the S1 in preference to the S5 as I wanted the more solid build, plus full sized HDMI and top screen display. One of the autofocus features I use the most is the tap to focus (can't remember exactly what is called). I recently filmed in a factory using a crane, so had my phone running Lumix sync via WiFi, and then was able to set a focus box and tap on my phone screen to set the focus area.  It worked flawlessly, plus the ability to also remotely set iso, white balance, shutter speed and aperture was amazing. The fact it takes fantastic photos is a bonus too.  I do agree with you about the limited lens options. However their quality is stunning, and if you're going to stick with the system then the investment makes sense. I hope you get the opportunity to do some travel videography 👍 and thanks for taking the time to write up your experiences.
    • Funny you mention the monopod - I use one on the base of my S1 with the stabilisation turned on and get very nice results. I have a Ronin S, but to be honest I still prefer the vest system I mistakenly sold after believing all the hype about gimbals. I think you're right in the direction of adding mass to the rig, particularly when it's offset, and if you can couple this with a camera with decent stabilisation the results are excellent and with almost zero setup. I do ninja walk though... I also would be interested if anyone has an alternative solution.
    • Hi, I'm Steve - videographer, editor and CGI dude. New shooter is my go-to site for video related stuff so delighted this forum has been created. Big user of MFT and full frame, but try not to be a fanboy about any particular system. Technology is there to serve us, not the other way round 😃
×
×
  • Create New...