Jump to content
Nezih

New Ergorig Review

Recommended Posts

Nice review, Nezih.  But something worth mentioning, that we did discuss in the other thread, the current ErgoRigs do not have the roll adjustment for the top plate, anymore.  The current shipping model(at least from the end of '19) only allows for horizontal adjustment.  Maybe if enough people ask for it, they will add the adjustment back  Or if buying directly from them, maybe they would customize it.

They had two sets of leftover top struts from the early shipping models, with the adjustment and swapped out mine that do not.  I should receive them on Tuesday, so I'll be able to see if rolling out the top stage will help my cameras sit more level.

I did buy my ErgoRig with the Underslung attachment and I've found it to kind of be in the way and not as useful as I thought it would be.  Three issues that I have with it: 1) The attachment that goes around the camera handle is bulky and in the way(but very well made).  2*) Where it attaches to the ErgoRig puts the whole underslung system too low.  To get a waist or chest shot, you have to have to pull the camera almost to the top of the rubber cord putting it into an awkward position and too close to the operators body.  3) It is cumbersome getting the camera back on your shoulder with the underslung still attached.  I found that the rubber cable tends to want to wrap itself around the camera when lifting it back up to re-shoulder it.

*They have come up with an added attachment(extra $) for the underslung that is basically an arm that goes out and up from the top plate(instead of just hanging down) where it normally attaches, giving you more height and presumably getting the camera away from you body slightly and into a better position, but I have not tried it or seen one in person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeah. I’m going to ask them about that change to the top levelling adjustments. Seems mad to remove it.

I saw that new “arm” for the under-sling. I’d like to try one. Kinda looks like it might get even more in the way of taking the camera on/off the shoulder quickly though. Hmmm...

Good additional feedback though, cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Nezih said:

Oh yeah. I’m going to ask them about that change to the top levelling adjustments. Seems mad to remove it.

I saw that new “arm” for the under-sling. I’d like to try one. Kinda looks like it might get even more in the way of taking the camera on/off the shoulder quickly though. Hmmm...

Good additional feedback though, cheers.

Thats how it looks to me, as well.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the replacement(old style) struts yesterday and put everything back together.  Rolled the top plate all the way down on the outer edge and slide it in towards me as far as it would go.  Immediately took care of about 90%-95% of the complaints I had with it.  It even sits lower.  I can completely take my hands off of my VariCam and it just sits there.  No more fighting it wanting to lean forward and into my head and even sitting too high.  My F55 isn’t quite as stable, but I’ve never been a big fan of Zacuto’s shoulder pad.  It’s no where near as good as a true ENG camera’s.

I’m going to email Cinema Devices and let them know how much of an improvement just being able to make that relatively small adjustment made.  Because unless it was adding a major expense to machining those top struts(no way it should have), every ErgoRig should be shipping with the ability to roll the top plate up or down like that.  Or at the very least, the option to order one with the adjustment.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear this helped you! Yes, definitely impress upon them how significant this is. I’ve mentioned it to them too.... and they’ve all seen my review mentioning his adjustment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nezih

its a nice review of Ergorig

as Run& Gun has mention that the current version of Ergorig is not having  the roll adjustment for the top plate, is very sad. as this option of roll adjustment will definitely helps the operator to balance the camera accordingly.

why at the first place they took out this roll adjustment?

now if anyone wants the old model of ERGORIG with roll adjustment how to get it.

one more thing

when the camera is resting on your shoulder what ever vibration due to operations( like running on a rough patch) are taken care by the shoulder, i mean shoulder acts as cushioning and counters the vibration to some extent. but here the camera is resting on a metal part where the body vibrations are directly transferred to camera . what's your say on this?

thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nuthan,

Sorry for the very slow reply!

I have no idea why they took out the roll adjustment. It's quite strange. I have actually flagged this with them before, but I didn't get a specific reply.

The camera isn't resting directly on metal: there is a soft cushioned pad that helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I spoke with them last year about mine, it seemed like a lot/most(?) of the user base is shooting with cameras with flat bottom or non-ENG style shoulder pads, so they don’t need to counteract that shape.  They actually, initially, recommended that I should have a flat plate made that I could lock onto the bottom of my cameras.  But it would have actually made one of my problems even worse(the camera sitting up too high causing me to look up and continually have my head and neck in a bad and uncomfortable position).

Unless the original design was adding significant cost to manufacturing or causing undesired consequences(like slipping under load), I don’t see why they needed to remove the adjustability.

If I had been stuck with the non-adjustable version, I would have returned mine or sold it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • New Posts

    • According to Panasonic the most common problem is that the camera shuts down by itself. Has anyone had that problem?
    • On further reflection what I have in mind isn't going to work anyway over a long period of time without proper sync even an external recording from the Z6 is going to drift relative to a separate audio recording. As far as I can tell there's no way to deal with this without a camera with a genlock input. The Ninja-V with the AtomX sync can record timecode but doesn't retime the input and only uses the genlock also available via the sync accessory for playback. There also doesn't seem to easily be such a thing as a retiming HDMI to SDI converter with REF IN as far as I can find. The audio side of things is easier as even on a relative cheap device like a Sound Devices Mix Pre 10 II it's possible to send word clock in to the BNC input and timecode to the aux input from a device such as a Ultrasync One. I guess the problem is simply too niche as it only crops up in broadcast where everything is expensive or long recordings of things like concerts with separate audio.
    • It is a great camera. I actually bought the S1 in preference to the S5 as I wanted the more solid build, plus full sized HDMI and top screen display. One of the autofocus features I use the most is the tap to focus (can't remember exactly what is called). I recently filmed in a factory using a crane, so had my phone running Lumix sync via WiFi, and then was able to set a focus box and tap on my phone screen to set the focus area.  It worked flawlessly, plus the ability to also remotely set iso, white balance, shutter speed and aperture was amazing. The fact it takes fantastic photos is a bonus too.  I do agree with you about the limited lens options. However their quality is stunning, and if you're going to stick with the system then the investment makes sense. I hope you get the opportunity to do some travel videography 👍 and thanks for taking the time to write up your experiences.
    • Funny you mention the monopod - I use one on the base of my S1 with the stabilisation turned on and get very nice results. I have a Ronin S, but to be honest I still prefer the vest system I mistakenly sold after believing all the hype about gimbals. I think you're right in the direction of adding mass to the rig, particularly when it's offset, and if you can couple this with a camera with decent stabilisation the results are excellent and with almost zero setup. I do ninja walk though... I also would be interested if anyone has an alternative solution.
    • Hi, I'm Steve - videographer, editor and CGI dude. New shooter is my go-to site for video related stuff so delighted this forum has been created. Big user of MFT and full frame, but try not to be a fanboy about any particular system. Technology is there to serve us, not the other way round 😃
×
×
  • Create New...