Jump to content
Jay

Review: Bright Tangerine Cage for C300 Mk III/C500 Mk II

Recommended Posts

Mine arrived in Aus a couple of days ago.  Camera still a few days away however very impressed with how solid the build is while keeping it very light compared to its competitors.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How necessary do people think the side panels of the cage are when using the cameras with a fairly lightweight setup (PL-mount primes, matte box, v-mount and Teradek out the back)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mark K said:

How necessary do people think the side panels of the cage are when using the cameras with a fairly lightweight setup (PL-mount primes, matte box, v-mount and Teradek out the back)?

With the updated design, you can quite quickly remove the side plates and just leave the top plate & baseplate. They don't weigh much though.

One important part that the sidesplates do is add rigidity to the camera build and takes any stress from the top handle.

If you're just going lightweight, you may even choose to take the camera out of the cage if everything is clipped on, without rods as you don't need to disassemble the cage to remove the camera

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/2/2020 at 2:30 AM, Mark K said:

How necessary do people think the side panels of the cage are when using the cameras with a fairly lightweight setup (PL-mount primes, matte box, v-mount and Teradek out the back)?

For me the side plates are an essential piece. The base of the c500ii, c200, and c300iii use a small screw on plate canon calls TB1. This relates to the issue that the base of the camera is not rock solid with whatever baseplate you are using. it is kind of wobbling. so if you use just a clip on matte box and no lens support you really want this sideplates to prevent the camera from shaking when you pull focus.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Günther Göberl said:

For me the side plates are an essential piece. The base of the c500ii, c200, and c300iii use a small screw on plate canon calls TB1. This relates to the issue that the base of the camera is not rock solid with whatever baseplate you are using. it is kind of wobbling. so if you use just a clip on matte box and no lens support you really want this sideplates to prevent the camera from shaking when you pull focus.

Good to know. Thanks Gunther 👍

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • New Posts

    • According to Panasonic the most common problem is that the camera shuts down by itself. Has anyone had that problem?
    • On further reflection what I have in mind isn't going to work anyway over a long period of time without proper sync even an external recording from the Z6 is going to drift relative to a separate audio recording. As far as I can tell there's no way to deal with this without a camera with a genlock input. The Ninja-V with the AtomX sync can record timecode but doesn't retime the input and only uses the genlock also available via the sync accessory for playback. There also doesn't seem to easily be such a thing as a retiming HDMI to SDI converter with REF IN as far as I can find. The audio side of things is easier as even on a relative cheap device like a Sound Devices Mix Pre 10 II it's possible to send word clock in to the BNC input and timecode to the aux input from a device such as a Ultrasync One. I guess the problem is simply too niche as it only crops up in broadcast where everything is expensive or long recordings of things like concerts with separate audio.
    • It is a great camera. I actually bought the S1 in preference to the S5 as I wanted the more solid build, plus full sized HDMI and top screen display. One of the autofocus features I use the most is the tap to focus (can't remember exactly what is called). I recently filmed in a factory using a crane, so had my phone running Lumix sync via WiFi, and then was able to set a focus box and tap on my phone screen to set the focus area.  It worked flawlessly, plus the ability to also remotely set iso, white balance, shutter speed and aperture was amazing. The fact it takes fantastic photos is a bonus too.  I do agree with you about the limited lens options. However their quality is stunning, and if you're going to stick with the system then the investment makes sense. I hope you get the opportunity to do some travel videography 👍 and thanks for taking the time to write up your experiences.
    • Funny you mention the monopod - I use one on the base of my S1 with the stabilisation turned on and get very nice results. I have a Ronin S, but to be honest I still prefer the vest system I mistakenly sold after believing all the hype about gimbals. I think you're right in the direction of adding mass to the rig, particularly when it's offset, and if you can couple this with a camera with decent stabilisation the results are excellent and with almost zero setup. I do ninja walk though... I also would be interested if anyone has an alternative solution.
    • Hi, I'm Steve - videographer, editor and CGI dude. New shooter is my go-to site for video related stuff so delighted this forum has been created. Big user of MFT and full frame, but try not to be a fanboy about any particular system. Technology is there to serve us, not the other way round 😃
×
×
  • Create New...