Jump to content
Marissa_the_Horrible

Anyone use C500II 5.9K raw files with FCPX? Weird issues...

Recommended Posts

As soon as I try to import the files into FCPX, it draws a purple line on the bottom of it, with the pattern randomly changing every time I make changes to it. It's not only the preview, it gets included in the export as well. Has anyone seen anything similar? I'm assuming its the canon raw plug-in, as it doesn't happen with 4K raw files, just with 5.9K....

Image 2020-05-17 at 9.16 PM.JPG

IMG_6120.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Matthew Allard ACS said:

Maybe someone here who owns a C500 Mark II can help with the answer to that. 

Issue seems to be resolved for now. I deleted fcpx, reinstalled it and then installed the canon raw plugin 1.3 and it’s good now. Weird... I also had a previous version of the raw plugin installed before that I used with the c200, maybe that’s what it was using instead of current one?? Just a good uneducated guess. It seems ok now luckily. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2020 at 10:11 PM, Marissa_the_Horrible said:

Issue seems to be resolved for now. I deleted fcpx, reinstalled it and then installed the canon raw plugin 1.3 and it’s good now. Weird... I also had a previous version of the raw plugin installed before that I used with the c200, maybe that’s what it was using instead of current one?? Just a good uneducated guess. It seems ok now luckily. 

Great that it's resolved. Havent used the C500MKII raw that much but it's played fine in Premiere and Resolve without that issue. Interesting note about the raw plugin, will keep that in mind for any future issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had also have the same issue when I upload raw images on FCPX, it looks grainy, or distorted and I don't have an backup of original files. Then I found tool on search Stellar Repair for Photo software which fix the raw image distorted issue. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Popular Topics

  • New Posts

    • Thank you for your experience. I will tell you mine with the XEEN. I dropped my Xeen 50mm t1.5 after 2 years of using it. I was thinking about buying a new one or getting them repaired. I called the German distributor of the Xeen lenses. I told him that I dropped the lens. EF mount is broken and one element inside the lens is loose and if he thinks that it makes sense to send it in for repair. He replied that this is no problem as I am still under warranty!!!!!! They provide 5 years warranty. I just had to send the lens in and after 3 days I got a brand-new lens with a new mount. As you can imagine I was pretty surprised!!  
    • Oh yeah, I get that.  But at least they are consulting with you and giving you a choice and not just forcing something on you. If only I had taken the money I spent on my first camera package and put it all in Apple stock then instead...  But it's probably all for the best.  If I'm a lazy AH, now, I can only imagine how bad I would be.  Lol.
    • @Run&Gun I hear you on the viewfinder, I do really want the 30 for that flip-out screen... unfortunately, I work for a giant organization so it’s more of a “this is what we’re ordering, like it or get out” situation... Yeah, and it would be nice to Have the 120 FPS that the 750 has as well. ah well, maybe one day I’ll strike it rich and just buy all my own equipment...
    • Most Sony and Panasonic broadcast cameras have had built-in CAC type correction for at least the last decade and they usually automatically recognize lenses.  At worst, you'd probably have to load a lens file in(usually provided by Sony or Panasonic), but then the cam should recognize the lens when it's connected. Regarding the flip out, that's why I suggested the EL30 VF.  It has a flip-out LCD panel on top of the main OLED body, so you can use it for the quick low walking hero shot or holding the cam over your head, etc.  The images on the OLED VF's on my F55 and C300(Graticle) kill the image of my Panasonic color LCD, BUT the Panasonic is a 3.5" panel with a double action flip away Diopter for when you need to see the image and can't be in the VF. Modern s35 cameras are insane in low-light, because you can crank the ISO fairly high with little noise introduced, but they are not built to do true ENG under the demanding, unforgiving conditions that we are subjected to, so often when doing it. And the 750 looks sick...  And about right back up there with what ENG cams used to cost us.  I can't find a US list price, but a direct translation from an Australian list price that I did find puts it around $40K US, which lines up with a review I read that said they were upwards of $80K for one with a lens and some basic support.  I think my first VariCam was sitting at at least $75K in a ready store shoot state.
    • Despite the 18-110 being quite irritating to work with, the image quality is good. It's bigger brother is supposed to be excellent on the FX9 with the new auto-focus.
×
×
  • Create New...