Jump to content
Erik Naso

What EF Lenses have the best DPAF performance?

Recommended Posts

With so many EF mount lenses available I was looking into picking up fast 50mm or 85mm EF mount lens primarily to use with a Cinema EOS camera or EOS R. The station has the EOS R so I could get some use from it. I have the Sigma 18-35 EF and the DPAF performance is okay but not at par with Canon native lenses. I'm not surprised by that but maybe other 3rd party lenses do work well.

What are your experiances with 3rd party lenses and DPAF performance? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used the Tamron 15-30 f/2.8, the first version, and the AF or Stabilizer never worked on my C300 MKII. Its been in issue since day one, over 5 years ago. Originally, I thought it was broken but it works on Canon stills cameras completely fine. I'm assuming the new crop of Tamrons might have the same problems with Cinema EOS cameras but don't know for sure. 

1451392313_1083963.jpg

Edited by jprshoots
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From all I've read, the G2 Tamron lenses are even more hobbled on the C100/200/300 series: no VC and no AF at all. I'm sad to hear your experience re the earlier models, as I was hoping the G1 15-30 would play nice with VC and DPAF on the C200. There must be a slightly different lens communication protocol happening in the Cinema cams, because the stills guys can use them just fine. Weird. 

One can hope that it's just a firmware fix away. But I'm not holding my breath.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you're looking for a 3rd party lens, but I believe the Canon 85mm 1.4 IS L is the last EF mount lens that Canon made, and it is right up there with the 35mm II 1.4 L as one of the best Canon EF lenses of all time. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, DcD said:

I know you're looking for a 3rd party lens, but I believe the Canon 85mm 1.4 IS L is the last EF mount lens that Canon made, and it is right up there with the 35mm II 1.4 L as one of the best Canon EF lenses of all time. 

Thanks! I keep hearing the 85mm 1.4 IS L is a winner. I'm more interested in AF performance than getting a 3rd party lens. Native Canon seems to work better.  

Edited by Erik Naso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • New Posts

    • Hi Nezih its a nice review of Ergorig as Run& Gun has mention that the current version of Ergorig is not having  the roll adjustment for the top plate, is very sad. as this option of roll adjustment will definitely helps the operator to balance the camera accordingly. why at the first place they took out this roll adjustment? now if anyone wants the old model of ERGORIG with roll adjustment how to get it. one more thing when the camera is resting on your shoulder what ever vibration due to operations( like running on a rough patch) are taken care by the shoulder, i mean shoulder acts as cushioning and counters the vibration to some extent. but here the camera is resting on a metal part where the body vibrations are directly transferred to camera . what's your say on this? thank you
    • Hannes Farima, I use My F3 with an Atomos Samurai, via SDI, and it works very well. Which recorder did you use? /Nicklas
    • Yeah its an interview / general lighting style I like and learnt ,as an assistant , from a guy who has now been Oscar nominated .. Barry Ackroyd BSC..  less is more as he says .. Europe has embraced this more natural style alot earlier than the US.. I would often get some push back from US directors who wanted back lights, fill lights,  hair lights , eye lights and lights under the chin..  !!  everywhere .. and it seems when I look at the forums on line ,the US still is generally using so many lights for a simple HS shot .. but the more "natural" look has at last taken off as it seems every Netflix doc is now done like this ..  with the larger sensor ,I have fx9 and shoot FF , interviews F1.8 or 2.8 ish .. there is often no longer any need to light up the BG much either ..
    • Gotcha.  Yeah, the V1 PSU/Ballast set-up is super janky. You sound like a man after my own heart.  I've always been a "no-fill" guy.  I like shadows in the right places.  One of the long running, very popular doc series I used to shoot for was a single light on the subject.  No hair or edge and no fill.  Just the key.  But we lit the HELL out of the background.  I can just imagine if we were shooting that same series today, instead of ~20+ years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...